Op Ed: Asm. Levine and Environmental Groups Send Governor a Letter Saying No to Nuclear

April 1, 2007

SACRAMENTO - Assemblymember Lloyd Levine (D-Woodland Hills), the Sierra Club California, Environment California, Coalition for Clean Air and Clean Power Campaign today delivered the following letter to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger stating why they oppose giving nuclear power a second chance. The Governor earlier said nuclear power has a great future because it has no greenhouse gas emissions and it's clean.

Dear Governor Schwarzenegger:

We are very concerned you are pushing the idea of giving nuclear power a second look as an answer to global warming when California has made a commitment to supporting other alternative energy solutions like wind, solar and geothermal technologies for the past four years.

Nuclear power comes with a vicious pollution cycle. The production process of mining uranium to fuel nuclear plants requires massive diesel powered machinery that grossly pollutes the air. The mined uranium would then have to be shipped to the United States in large, diesel powered ships and reprocessed into nuclear fuel in pollution producing coke ovens.

Nuclear power is expensive. It costs $10 billion dollars or more to construct a single nuclear power plant. Construction is so expensive that no utility is willing to undertake the endeavor without massive subsidies. Additionally, nuclear power plants are so risky that for the last 50 years the federal government has had to provide liability protection for plant operators to cover potential disasters. That does not inspire confidence in a state like California. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, California is filled with thousands of identified and unidentified earthquake faults capable of causing a 7.0 magnitude earthquake.

The California Legislature enacted nuclear power plant safety laws in 1976. These laws have served us well. Before new nuclear plants could be built in California, we would need to repeal those laws and give up the protection they provide. One of those laws prohibits construction of new nuclear plants until there is a proven means for safe dispose of the highly radioactive spent nuclear fuel the plants produce. In the 28 years since those safety laws were enacted, we have come no nearer to a solution to the nuclear waste disposal problem today than we were then. And remember, that spent fuel has a lethal half life of 500,000 years.

Today there is highly radioactive waste stored at four nuclear plants in California including two that were shut down more than two decades ago. That's because the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission still hasn't provided a disposal facility for the toxic waste at Sacramento's Rancho Seco plant and PG & E's Humboldt Bay plant. On California's pristine coast nuclear material is being stored on-site at San Onofre and Diablo Canyon nuclear plants.

If Californians give nuclear power a second chance we will be moving in the wrong direction and relying on false promises. Today, even during a housing and economic slump, homeowners and businesses are turning to affordable, safe, clean and dependable energy in huge numbers.

In fact, the renewable energy legislation you have signed into law has given California the greenest, most environmentally friendly portfolio in the country. With inflation factored in, retail electricity prices have decreased by 10.7 percent while California made an aggressive commitment toward renewable energy and other clean sources of electricity.

California's new renewable energy market has broad economic value and it is cost effective. It allows renewable companies to compete keeping the economy robust and creating thousands of jobs just like the technology industry in the Silicon Valley. With economic indicators pointing toward a dismal year, the jobs created by clean energy can help counter the downturn in the housing and financial sectors.

As the solar industry is proving, renewable energy costs less with time and improvements as opposed to nuclear power that has only become more expensive over the years.

Nuclear power has no future in California's new energy era. It is dirty, dangerous, too expensive and cannot exist without massive taxpayer subsidies.

We agree with the recent Los Angeles Times editorial asking you to fully employ the safer, quicker, cheaper and cleaner alternatives such as solar and wind power.

Sincerely,

Assemblymember Lloyd Levine (D-Woodland Hills) Chair, Assembly Utilities and Commerce Committee

Jim P. Metropulos
Senior Advocate

Sierra Club California

Bernadette Del Chiaro
Clean Energy Advocate

Environment California

Tim Carmichael
Senior Director of Policy
Coalition for Clean Air

V. John White
Executive Director
Clean Power Campaign

Originally published in Calitics.